Online vs In-Person A-Level Biology Tutoring
An honest, evidence-based comparison of online and face-to-face biology tutoring — what the research shows, what it costs, and what actually works best for A-Level Biology students.
Last updated: February 2026
The UK Tutoring Landscape Has Changed Permanently
Before 2020, online tutoring was a niche option — just 9% of students chose it. The pandemic forced a rapid shift, and what many expected to be temporary has become permanent. Approximately half of all UK private tuition is now delivered online, and this proportion continues to grow.
For A-Level Biology students, this shift has opened up access to specialist tutors who would previously have been out of reach geographically. A student in Newcastle can now work with a Chartered Biologist and former examiner who lives in Wales, and the only thing that matters is the quality of the teaching.
What Does the Research Say?
There is a common assumption that in-person tutoring must be more effective than online. The research evidence tells a more nuanced story.
The EEF Finding
The Education Endowment Foundation — the UK’s most authoritative evidence source for educational effectiveness — states that tutoring delivered through digital technology shows broadly similar effects to face-to-face delivery. This finding is drawn from a substantial evidence base of meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials.
The US Department of Education Meta-Analysis
The foundational meta-analysis by Means et al. (commissioned by the US Department of Education) found that blended learning — combining online and in-person elements — actually produced more positive outcomes than either pure face-to-face or pure distance learning. Pure online learning produced results at least as good as face-to-face.
More Recent Evidence
Research from the Johns Hopkins Center for Research and Reform in Education (2023–2025) found that virtual tutoring “nearly rivals” in-person tutoring when well-designed. The Stanford National Student Support Accelerator (October 2023) found online video-call tutoring produced a meaningful effect size of 0.26 standard deviations — positive but somewhat lower than the 0.37 overall pooled effect from the broader Nickow meta-analysis.
A Direct Comparison
| Factor | Online Tutoring | In-Person Tutoring |
|---|---|---|
| Research evidence | Broadly similar effects to face-to-face (EEF); slightly lower effect sizes in some studies | Marginally higher effect sizes overall, but the difference is small |
| Typical A-Level cost | Average £41.95/hr; specialist from £60/hr | Average £51.78/hr; specialist from £80/hr |
| Access to specialists | Nationwide — geography is irrelevant; access to the best tutors regardless of location | Limited to tutors within reasonable travel distance |
| Lesson recordings | Most platforms offer recording; student can review entire sessions for revision | Not practical to record; student must rely on notes |
| Biological diagrams | Digital whiteboards with tablet; diagrams saved automatically; can be built up in layers | Paper and pen; more natural for some; but diagrams are lost or hard to preserve |
| Student focus | Some students find screens distracting; requires self-discipline | Physical presence aids concentration; body language cues easier to read |
| Scheduling flexibility | Very flexible; no travel time needed; easy to fit around school and revision | Must account for travel time; less last-minute flexibility |
| Parent oversight | Parents can listen from another room; recorded sessions can be reviewed | Harder to monitor unless present in the room |
| Technical requirements | Reliable internet, webcam, microphone needed; technical issues can disrupt sessions | No technology required beyond materials; no connectivity concerns |
The Biology-Specific Question — Can It Be Taught Effectively Online?
A-Level Biology has specific characteristics that make the online-vs-in-person decision more nuanced than for subjects like maths or English.
Biological Diagrams
Drawing and interpreting biological diagrams — from the structure of DNA and cell organelles to metabolic pathways and ecological pyramids — is central to A-Level Biology. This is the area where parents most commonly worry about online delivery.
The reality is that modern digital whiteboards handle diagrams well. A graphics tablet or iPad paired with a shared whiteboard allows tutors to draw diagrams in real-time while the student watches and participates. The diagrams can be colour-coded, built up in layers, and — crucially — saved automatically for later revision. Published research in the Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education specifically documents the effectiveness of digital whiteboards for biological diagram activities.
Data Analysis and Mathematical Skills
All exam boards now require at least 10% of marks for mathematical skills, and 15% of exam marks test practical skills including data analysis. Working through statistical tests (chi-squared, standard deviation, correlation coefficients), graph interpretation, and experimental design can be done effectively through shared screens. In many ways, the ability to zoom in on specific data, annotate graphs digitally, and step through calculations on a shared whiteboard can be more effective than working on paper side by side.
Past Paper Practice
Working through past papers is arguably the single most important revision activity for A-Level Biology. Online tutoring makes this seamless — the tutor can screen-share any past paper, annotate mark schemes in real-time, and model how to construct answers. For boards like AQA where mark scheme precision is critical, the ability to display the exact mark scheme alongside the question is a genuine advantage of the digital format.
What Good Online Biology Tutoring Looks Like
The gap between good and bad online tutoring is significantly larger than the gap between good online and good in-person tutoring. Here is what separates the two.
Signs of a Professional Online Setup
- Collaborative digital whiteboard (Bramble, BitPaper, or similar) — not just a basic video call
- Graphics tablet or iPad for handwritten annotations and biological diagrams
- External webcam and microphone (not built-in laptop hardware)
- Good front-facing lighting so the tutor is clearly visible
- Wired internet connection for stability (not WiFi)
- Session recording available for student review
- Pre-loaded resources: past papers, specifications, mark schemes, teaching slides
- Screen sharing capability for working through papers and mark schemes together
Red Flags in Online Tutoring
If a tutor simply runs a basic video call with no interactive tools — no whiteboard, no screen sharing, no way to draw diagrams or annotate materials — that is not professional online tutoring. It is a phone call with a camera. The research on online tutoring effectiveness assumes proper technology is being used; a bare-bones video call will deliver significantly worse results.
Other warning signs include no lesson recording, no session planning or structure, poor audio or video quality, and no follow-up between sessions. As tutoring research consistently notes: good practice in tutoring transcends the medium, but the technology must be fit for purpose.
When to Choose Online vs In-Person
Online tutoring is likely the better choice when:
- No specialist A-Level Biology tutor is available locally — online gives you access to the best tutors nationwide
- Scheduling is tight — no travel time means sessions can fit more flexibly around school and revision
- You want lesson recordings for later revision — this is unique to online delivery
- Cost is a primary consideration — online is approximately 20% cheaper
- The student is in Year 13 and time-pressured — maximum efficiency per session
In-person tutoring may be better when:
- The student struggles to concentrate on screens — some students genuinely focus better face-to-face
- There is no reliable internet connection at home
- The student is very young for A-Level or lacks independent study skills
- Building a personal rapport is essential — some students respond better to physical presence
- The student specifically needs hands-on practical guidance (though this is rare in tutoring contexts)
Frequently Asked Questions
The EEF finds that digital tutoring produces broadly similar effects to face-to-face. The US Department of Education meta-analysis found blended learning outperformed pure face-to-face instruction. For A-Level Biology, no board-specific studies exist, but well-equipped online tutoring works effectively for diagram work, data analysis, and past paper practice.
Online A-Level Biology tutoring is approximately 20% cheaper. Tutorful data shows average online rates of £41.95/hr versus £51.78/hr for in-person. The savings come from eliminated travel time and costs for the tutor.
Yes, when the tutor uses proper tools. A graphics tablet or iPad paired with a shared whiteboard allows real-time drawing of biological diagrams. Published research documents the effectiveness of digital whiteboards for biological diagram activities. Many tutors find digital tools actually make it easier to build complex diagrams step by step, and diagrams are saved automatically for later revision.
A professional setup should include a collaborative digital whiteboard, high-quality webcam and microphone, a graphics tablet or iPad for annotations, screen sharing, session recording, and a wired internet connection. If a tutor is just running a basic video call with no interactive tools, that is a red flag.
Approximately 50% of all UK private tuition is now delivered online, up from just 9% in early 2019. The UK online tutoring market is growing at roughly 12% per year and is projected to reach over £1 billion by 2030. The shift has been permanent, not a temporary pandemic response.
Disclaimer: Research citations are from published meta-analyses and the EEF Teaching & Learning Toolkit. Pricing data is based on publicly available information as of early 2026. No A-Level Biology-specific RCTs comparing online and in-person tutoring exist; findings are extrapolated from general tutoring research. Biology Education and its author accept no responsibility for individual outcomes.



